5 Principles of Starting a Web 2.0 Company

Starting a service-based company, especially a Web 2.0 website or 3.0 depending on your site, is far less costly and easy to start then any product-based company. Follow the 5 principles of starting a Web 2.0 company and you’ll be sure to survive the tough water.


1.    Manage expectations:
No matter if you are talking to an investor or your team, always make sure that they know what direction you’re taking and how you will get there. “Under-promise and Over-deliver” is a good rule of thumb to help manage expectations and maintain future momentum.


2.    Plan for the worst and hope for the best: Any web implementation or roll out will take much longer than expected PERIOD! If it’s on time, count your blessings and take out the bubbly. Every web project or addition will take much longer due to testing, not enough resources, or simply specifications seem to continuously change as users begin to work with the service. Regardless, make sure that you plan accordingly and understand that things will almost always NOT go according to plan.


3.    Understand your financials:
And make sure that you really do! It is extremely important to determine what your revenue sources and expenses are like. If you do not maintain and understand your financials, you’re not running a company but just managing a hobby. Start with your expenses and work your way backward to determine how much and when you need to be making in order to break-even.


4.    Plan to re-forecast every few months:
Any projects, plans, or strategy that you have come up WILL change and it might even change more frequently than monthly. The point is to be flexible and understand that things will veer off path but as an Entrepreneur your job is to re-adjust and push forward.  A good rule of thumb is every 3 months, take a look at what you have accomplished or haven’t then place a stake 3 months out and create an action plan of achieving milestones to reach that goal.


5.    Think HUGE! If you’re going to create a web 2.0 / 3.0 / 5.0 company (I think you get the point), make sure that its end result has a HUGE market potential . The concept here is to make that your time, resources, and energy is well spent. Create a test scenario that places the venture to reach 100% (which will never happen) of its projected goals. Once you have done so, really look at if your venture will be making sufficient money to support yourself, co-founders, employee, etc… You don’t have to ramp sales in 1 or 2 years but make sure that the end result is well worth it.

Point of clarification: a Web 2.0 company is your regular brochure wear type website that can create a marketplace where goods/services are bought and/or sold. Vague I know; but that’s because there are thousands of sites such as Woot, TigerDirect, NewEgg, etc… that do so. On the other hand a Web 3.0 in my opinion creates a platform in which users customize, integrate, and  bend the site to accomplish their own personal objective. Examples include iGoogle, Amazon, Ebay, etc…

Regardless of what type of dot com company you're trying to start be sure to think it through and understand the reasoning behind your venture. The longer you wait to plan, the less you will accomplish, and loose your opportunity to claim your space.

Have any other points that can help an Entrepreneur start a web-based venture, please share it below.
 

If you have any other questions, send me an email or post a comment.
Ashkan

Ashkan[at]greenhornconnect[dot]com


 

Discussion

Ashkan,   I'm curious about

Ashkan,

 

I'm curious about how you arrived at those definitions of web 2.0 / web 3.0, and particularly if you have any examples of others who share them? It's only my intent to provide constructive criticism here, but your use of the terms seems to just be as buzzwords; they don't really make who the post / advice is targeted to any more clear. The type of company doesn't even seem to be relevant to the advice you provide.

 

I'd love to see a revision of your post where the message is a little more targeted and the advice is much more actionable.

Hope this helps

 Jay, 

Thanks for the comment. I would like to start off by saying that the whole point of using the terms Web 2.0, 3.0, etc... was to illustrate the lack of clarification for each term. 

 

If you do a simply Google search for Web 2.0 you will hundreds of different 'perspectives' on what that encompasses.  

 

I based my blog post on the assumption that a Web 2.0 is a website that allows users to connect with one another for either viewing and/or contributing content and also the sale of good or services.  

 

Web 3.0 is a term that I completely made up quote: “On the other hand a Web 3.0 in my opinion creates”. I justified the term as a website that is customizable by the users to perform certain task which could include the sale of a good or service. These sites create a base platform and then leave it to the end-user to determine how he/she will use their product.

 

iGoogle is the PERFECT example, allowing users to change anything from their background to what kind of applications they would to have on their home screen. They have even taken it a step further and will cater certain search result based on geography, users habits, and other search profiles.

 

Web 5.0 was mention to simply illustrate that this is just getting out of hand and how ‘industry’ professionals keep throwing terms around like they actually mean anything. I guess its up to the individual user to determine the definition for each term.

 

Ask any of your friends, family, etc… what they think is Web 2.0 and I guarantee you’ll get 50 different answers.

 

Regardless, my points were simply to get Entrepreneurs who always think that creating a website is a great idea to think again. They assume because of low barriers to entry, low fixed or variable costs, and the ability to use resources such as Guru or outsourcing options can turn a site into a growth venture. In reality, making money off a website is extremely difficult if not executed properly. I’m sure you have heard rumors about Facebook still not being able to break-even or make profit, that’s because monetizing any website is no simple task.

 

That being said, if you got a great idea for a website such as www.milliondollarhomepage.com don’t let me stop you from making a million bucks off one page.

 

Hope that clears up anything that I inadvertently portrayed to be actual facts rather than my own opinion.

 

If you have any future questions/comments, please don’t hesitate.

Ashkan