Alex Moore: How We Can Improve the Startup Ecosystem: Stop the Secrecy
At the Angel Bootcamp last week, Boston investors, aspiring investors, and entrepreneurs had a great opportunity to discuss how to improve the ecosystem for early-stage companies in Boston. One of the most powerful suggestions came from Jean Hammond, who said that we need to do a better job of mixing together investors and entrepreneurs.
We saw last week that there is no shortage of angel investors in Boston, and there definitely are plenty of entrepreneurs looking to connect with them. How can we make it so that more of these connections get made in Boston? Essentially, as Jean said, we need more startup parties.
She’s right, but even more important, we need to make sure that the startup parties that we already have are helping the ecosystem. To do that, we need to work together to overcome the culture of secrecy that divides us, keeps us from meeting each other, and makes our startup culture weaker.
Thanks to Twitter and Scott Kirsner's regular "Who I Saw at Secret Exclusive Event X" posts, it's easier than ever to see just how many secretive, in-crowd-only parties are going on in Boston.
As you might expect, the old guard on Mount Money leads the charge. Most notable is 12x12, a new initiative to pair “young” entrepreneurs with CEOs of highly successful companies, with lots of one-on-one mentorship as they launch a startup. Naturally, the program was developed completely in secret, with only already highly-networked entrepreneurs involved. It was announced at the Nantucket conference, where there was only a single person under the age of 30. The first company chosen to participate? LighterLiving.com, a portfolio company from one of the VCs backing the initiative. And more importantly, there's no information on the entrepreneur selection process on the 12x12 site.
The culture of secrecy permeates Mount Money - how many young entrepreneurs were hanging around at General Catalyst's startup party in early May?
But surely that's a problem limited to the outdated VC firms out in Waltham and 128, whose like are disappearing as more agile VC firms move into the city? Think again. Even the parties tailored toward young entrepreneurs are often secret in Boston. Did you know about Popsignal Mix6 last week? How about BYTE Night8 two weeks ago? Did you hear about the first 5 Popsignal Mixes or the first 7 BYTE Nights?
We have plenty of startup parties. We are just, collectively, not invited to many of them.
Of course, there are plenty of people in Boston who are doing it right -- like the Lean Startup Party, Yaddapalooza, and DART Boston’s one year anniversary party that all happened May 27th and were open to all. Laura and the oneforty gang do a great job of mixing investors and ramen-level entrepreneurs whenever they throw a party, because if you see it on Twitter, you can pretty much find your way there.
And there’s even plenty of room for invitation-only events and parts of events, like Jon put together for the pitch session component of Angel Bootcamp. What makes the other kind of events destructive is that they’re kept hush-hush, making sure all the ideas come from people who were in the room the last time.
Instead of getting together with the same group of people to pat each other on the back and/or bitch about Valley Envy, let's open up our doors, have more fun, and get some fresh ideas and new blood in the room. As David Cancel put it at Angel Bootcamp, the next generation of entrepreneurship can’t be found on 128, and it's not at your lake house in Maine. It's also not at secret, invite-only startup events.
Alex Moore is a TechStars alum working on his startup Baydin, which is changing the way you email.












Discussion
We need more of everything, including small events
Alex,
I think you make some solid points about mixing people who don't usually mix (e.g. new vs. experienced entrepreneurs, old and young, entrepreneur and investors).
However, I disagree that we need to avoid doing small exclusive events. Small events do a better job of creating quality relationships and introductions, which help everyone involved. Due to their size, though, they are inherently going to be at least a bit exclusive.
At the end of the day, we need to do MORE of everything to make it happen, big and small, local and remote events, tech focused and social focused, founder dating, meetups, etc. We shouldn't limit the goals and aspirations of any one group to fit a pre-determined mold.
It's also worth noting that PopSignal did have some massive party events early on (700+ people) and moved to the smaller events to focus on building quality relationships in addition to getting people in the same place. And they may be doing some of those in the future as well.
-Ariel
Re: We need more of everything, including small events
Ariel,
I understand your concern and definitely agree there is value in exclusive events; as Alex mentioned, Angel Bootcamp had a piece of exclusivity that ensured good pitches for the angels.
The key is being Open. People knew about Angel Bootcamp and the criteria and selection process were clear. In the case of Pop Signal, it's very private and they don't even like to discuss what the event is to anyone who isn't invited. BYTE has even gone so far as to ask to not be listed on Greenhorn Connect (they really did email me to take it down) and they keep their events as secret as possible.
They say "Sunlight is the best disinfectant." Being open and honest about your organization will only make it stronger.
-Jason
Ariel, you're right that
Ariel, you're right that there's a place for small, selective events. Absolutely. The quality of conversation you get at an event with 30 people is totally different than an event with 300 people, and if you open the door to a cool event to everyone, you get 300 people.
I totally get that - the problem I'm describing is pretty much what Jason said in his response. Small events are great, but secret ones aren't so great. As long as there's a way for people to find out what the selective events are, and find out more about them, they're good in my book, because they're helping make the ecosystem work better.
Great Post
Great points, Alex. Very clear, and accurate.
12x12 is particularly distressing, given how highly-touted it has been, yet how completely closed to the public it is.
Josh Bob
Angels/Investors meet the Entrepreneurs
I'd even argue that the party format isn't necessarily the best way of getting everyone together. After all, what do they say about dating? Go out and do what you love and people will notice, and you'll attract someone who loves the same things you do.
So, perhaps that might be the way to go ...?